Dose comparison between TG-43-based calculations and radiochromic film measurements of the Freiburg flap applicator used for high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments of skin lesions.

Saad Aldelaijan, Hamed Bekerat, Ivan Buzurovic, Phillip Devlin, Francois DeBlois, Jan Seuntjens, Slobodan Devic

Journal: Brachytherapy 2018;16(5):1065-1072

PMID: 28735877

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current high-dose-rate brachytherapy skin treatments with the Freiburg flap (FF) applicator are planned with treatment planning systems based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-43 data sets, which assume full backscatter conditions in dose calculations. The aim of this work is to describe an experimental method based on radiochromic film dosimetry to evaluate dose calculation accuracy during surface treatments with the FF applicator at different depths and bolus thicknesses.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Absolute doses were measured using a reference EBT3 radiochromic film dosimetry system within a Solid Water phantom at different depths (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 cm) with respect to the phantom surface. The impact of bolus (up to 3-cm thickness) placed on top of the applicator was investigated for two clinical loadings created using Oncentra MasterPlan: 5 cm × 5 cm and 11 cm × 11 cm.

RESULTS

For smaller loading and depths beyond 2 cm and for larger loading and depths beyond 1 cm, the dose difference was less than 3% (±4%). At shallower depths, differences of up to 6% (±4%) at the surface were observed if no bolus was added. The addition of 2-cm bolus for the smaller loading and 1 cm for larger loading minimized the difference to less than 3% (±4%).

CONCLUSIONS

For typical FF applicator loading sizes, the actual measured dose was 6% (±4%) lower at the skin level when compared with TG-43. Additional bolus above the FF was shown to decrease the dose difference. The consideration of change in clinical practice should be carefully investigated in light of clinical reference data.

Copyright © 2017 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: [email protected].; Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.; Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.