Vascular risk factors in INPH: A prospective case-control study (the INPH-CRasH study).

Hanna Israelsson, Bo Carlberg, Carsten Wikkelsö, Katarina Laurell, Babar Kahlon, Göran Leijon, Anders Eklund, Jan Malm

Journal: Neurology 2017;88(6):577-585

PMID: 28062721

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the complete vascular risk factor (VRF) profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) using a large sample of representative patients with INPH and population-based controls to determine the extent to which vascular disease influences INPH pathophysiology.

METHODS

All patients with INPH who underwent shunting in Sweden in 2008-2010 were compared to age- and sex-matched population-based controls. Inclusion criteria were age 60-85 years and no dementia. The 10 most important VRFs and cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease were prospectively assessed using blood samples, clinical examinations, and standardized questionnaires. Assessed VRFs were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, obesity, psychosocial factors, smoking habits, diet, alcohol intake, cardiac disease, and physical activity.

RESULTS

In total, 176 patients with INPH and 368 controls participated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR] 2.380; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.434-3.950), diabetes (OR 2.169; 95% CI 1.195-3.938), obesity (OR 5.428; 95% CI 2.502-11.772), and psychosocial factors (OR 5.343; 95% CI 3.219-8.868) were independently associated with INPH. Hypertension, physical inactivity, and cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease were also overrepresented in INPH. Moderate alcohol intake and physical activity were overrepresented among the controls. The population-attributable risk percentage was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that patients with INPH have more VRFs and lack the protective factors present in the general population. Almost 25% of cases of INPH may be explained by VRFs. This suggests that INPH may be a subtype of vascular dementia. Targeted interventions against modifiable VRFs are likely to have beneficial effects on INPH.

© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.

Address: From the Departments of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (H.I., K.L., J.M.), Public Health and Clinical Medicine (B.C.), and Radiation Sciences (A.E.), and Center for Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.E.), Umeå University; Institute of Neuroscience (C.W.), Sahlgrens Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Neurosurgery (B.K.), Lund University; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKE) (G.L.), Division of Neuroscience, Linköping University, Sweden. [email protected].; From the Departments of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (H.I., K.L., J.M.), Public Health and Clinical Medicine (B.C.), and Radiation Sciences (A.E.), and Center for Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.E.), Umeå University; Institute of Neuroscience (C.W.), Sahlgrens Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Neurosurgery (B.K.), Lund University; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKE) (G.L.), Division of Neuroscience, Linköping University, Sweden.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.