Bala Bhagavath, Greiner Ellie, Kara M Griffiths, Tom Winter, Snigdha Alur-Gupta, Carter Richardson, Steven R Lindheim
Journal: Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2018;72(6):377-392
PMID: 28661551
IMPORTANCE
The prevalence of uterine malformations has been reported in up to 7% of the general population and 18% of those with recurrent pregnancy loss. The diagnosis, classification, management, and outcome of the management have been subject to debate for decades.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this article is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the genetics of müllerian anomalies, the varied classification schemes, the appropriate diagnostic modalities, the surgical methods, and the obstetric outcomes related to these surgical methods.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
An extensive literature review using the key words , , , , , , , , , , and was conducted using PubMed. Only English-language publications were reviewed. Relevant references within these publications were also obtained and reviewed in preparing this article.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence favors continued use of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine classification. Three-dimensional sonography, especially when combined with saline infusion, can be very helpful in accurately classifying müllerian anomalies.
RELEVANCE
Müllerian anomalies are relatively common. Accurate knowledge of the advantages and limitations of various diagnostic modalities, the limitations of the classification systems, the surgical options available where appropriate, and the obstetric outcomes after these surgeries will help in the optimal management of these patients.
Other Literature Sources:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.