Prospective crossover study for a standardized comparison of the dextrane sulfate whole blood and plasma apheresis system in patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia.

Wolfgang Ramlow, Heinrich Prophet, Grit Waitz

Journal: Atherosclerosis. Supplements 2018;30():99-107

PMID: 29096869

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The objective of this study was a standardized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of the Kaneka (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) whole blood (Liposorber DL-100) and plasma (Liposorber LA-15) lipoprotein apheresis (LA) system to optimize the individual therapy of patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia.

METHODS

Six chronic LA patients with a pre-treatment LDL-C < 6 mmol/l in steady state received a total of three treatments with the LA-15 device, followed by three treatments with the DL-100 device or vice versa. To achieve a standardized comparison the treated blood volume for any patient was kept identical for both procedures. Sampling points for total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), triglyceride, blood count, and bradykinin measurements were adjusted for both techniques.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), and triglycerides were reduced by 59.2 ± 6.5%, 79.3 ± 6.9%, 7.1 ± 3.9%, 87.3 ± 3.1%, 22.5 ± 24.2% using the DL-100 system and by 51.4 ± 5.2%, 65.2 ± 3.7%, 2.2 ± 4.9%, 72.7 ± 2.2%, 46.5 ± 9.4% using the LA-15 system, showing that the DL-100 adsorber was significantly more effective for lowering total cholesterol (p = 0.044), LDL-C (p = 0.001), Lp(a) (p = 0.029), while triglycerides were reduced to a higher extent by the plasma system (p = 0.046) in this patient group. The regenerable LA-15 adsorber columns showed a higher removal capacity considering the difference between inflow and outflow concentrations. Bradykinin levels significantly increased up to 145 fold in the outflow lines using the plasma system (p = 0.028), but not systemically. There was no significant bradykinin generation using the whole blood adsorber.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the whole blood system was faster and more effective in this LA patient group with pre apheresis LDL-C<6 mmol/l. Whether the regenerable plasma system is more effective in patients with higher LDL-C content should be evaluated in future standardized comparisons.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Address: Apheresis Center Rostock (ACR), Nephrocare Rostock GmbH, Nobelstr. 53, 18059 Rostock, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].; Apheresis Center Rostock (ACR), Nephrocare Rostock GmbH, Nobelstr. 53, 18059 Rostock, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].; Apheresis Center Rostock (ACR), Nephrocare Rostock GmbH, Nobelstr. 53, 18059 Rostock, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.