Effects of different ratios of glucose to acetate on phosphorus removal and microbial community of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system.

Ting Xie, Chuangrong Mo, Xiaoming Li, Jian Zhang, Hongxue An, Qi Yang, Dongbo Wang, Jianwei Zhao, Yu Zhong, Guangming Zeng

Journal: Environmental science and pollution research international 2017;24(5):4494-4505

PMID: 27943155

Abstract

In this study, the effects of different ratios of glucose to acetate on enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) were investigated with regard to the changes of intercellular polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and glycogen, as well as microbial community. The experiments were carried out in five sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) fed with glucose and/or acetate as carbon sources at the ratios of 0:100 %, 25:75 %, 50:50 %, 75:25 %, and 100:0 %. The experimental results showed that a highest phosphorus removal efficiency of 96.3 % was obtained with a mixture of glucose and acetate at the ratio of 50:50 %, which should be attributed to more glycogen and polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) transformation in this reactor during the anaerobic condition. PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of sludge samples taken from different anaerobic/aerobic (A/O) SBRs revealed that microbial community structures were distinctively different with a low similarity between each other.

Address: College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.; Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha, 410082, China.; School of Environment, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China. [email protected].; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China. [email protected].; Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha, 410082, China. [email protected].; Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530200, China.

Link outs

Free resources

Other Literature Sources:

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.