Sorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer - a UK Audit.

J King, D H Palmer, P Johnson, P Ross, R A Hubner, K Sumpter, S Darby, C Braconi, C Iwuji, D Swinson, P Collins, K Patel, J Nobes, I Muazzam, C Blesing, A Kirkwood, S Nash, T Meyer

Journal: Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2017;29(4):256-262

PMID: 27964898

Abstract

AIMS

Sorafenib is the current standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We carried out a national audit of UK patients treated with sorafenib as standard-of-care and those treated with systemic therapy in first-line trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sorafenib-treated and trial-treated patients were identified via the Cancer Drugs Fund and local databases. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records according to a standard case report form. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 448 sorafenib-treated patients from 15 hospitals. The median age was 68 years (range 17-89) and 75% had performance status ≤ 1. At baseline, 77% were Child-Pugh A and 16.1% Child-Pugh B; 38% were albumin-bilirubin grade 1 (ALBI-1) and 48% ALBI-2; 23% were Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification B (BCLC-B) and 72% BCLC-C. The median time on sorafenib was 3.6 months, with a mean daily dose of 590 mg. The median overall survival for 448 evaluable sorafenib-treated patients was 8.5 months. There were significant differences in overall survival comparing Child-Pugh A versus Child-Pugh B (9.5 versus 4.6 months), ALBI-1 versus ALBI-2 (12.9 versus 5.9 months) and BCLC-B versus BCLC-C (13.0 versus 8.3 months). For trial-treated patients (n=109), the median overall survival was 8.1 months and this was not significantly different from the sorafenib-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

For Child-Pugh A patients with good performance status, survival outcomes were similar to those reported in global randomised controlled trials. Patients with ALBI grade > 1, Child-Pugh B or poor performance status seem to derive limited benefit from sorafenib treatment.

Copyright © 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Oncology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.; King's College Hospital, London, UK.; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.; University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.; Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.; University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.; Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.; Great Western Hospital NHS Trust, Swindon, UK.; Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.; Department of Oncology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.