Evaluation of the Clinical and Microbiological Response to Salmonella Paratyphi A Infection in the First Paratyphoid Human Challenge Model.

Hazel C Dobinson, Malick M Gibani, Claire Jones, Helena B Thomaides-Brears, Merryn Voysey, Thomas C Darton, Claire S Waddington, Danielle Campbell, Iain Milligan, Liqing Zhou, Sonu Shrestha, Simon A Kerridge, Anna Peters, Zoe Stevens, Audino Podda, Laura B Martin, Flavia D'Alessio, Duy Pham Thanh, Buddha Basnyat, Stephen Baker, Brian Angus, Myron M Levine, Christoph J Blohmke, Andrew J Pollard

Journal: Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2017;64(8):1066-1073

PMID: 28158395

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To expedite the evaluation of vaccines against paratyphoid fever, we aimed to develop the first human challenge model of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A infection.

METHODS

Two groups of 20 participants underwent oral challenge with S. Paratyphi A following sodium bicarbonate pretreatment at 1 of 2 dose levels (group 1: 1-5 × 103 colony-forming units [CFU] and group 2: 0.5-1 × 103 CFU). Participants were monitored in an outpatient setting with daily clinical review and collection of blood and stool cultures. Antibiotic treatment was started when prespecified diagnostic criteria were met (temperature ≥38°C for ≥12 hours and/or bacteremia) or at day 14 postchallenge.

RESULTS

The primary study objective was achieved following challenge with 1-5 × 103 CFU (group 1), which resulted in an attack rate of 12 of 20 (60%). Compared with typhoid challenge, paratyphoid was notable for high rates of subclinical bacteremia (at this dose, 11/20 [55%]). Despite limited symptoms, bacteremia persisted for up to 96 hours after antibiotic treatment (median duration of bacteremia, 53 hours [interquartile range, 24-85 hours]). Shedding of S. Paratyphi A in stool typically preceded onset of bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenge with S. Paratyphi A at a dose of 1-5 × 103 CFU was well tolerated and associated with an acceptable safety profile. The frequency and persistence of bacteremia in the absence of clinical symptoms was notable, and markedly different from that seen in previous typhoid challenge studies. We conclude that the paratyphoid challenge model is suitable for the assessment of vaccine efficacy using endpoints that include bacteremia and/or symptomatology.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02100397.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Address: Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.; Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.; GSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health, Siena, Italy.; European Vaccine Initiative, Heidelberg, Germany.; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.; Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.; Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.