Intervening to reduce workplace sitting: mediating role of social-cognitive constructs during a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Nyssa T Hadgraft, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Genevieve N Healy, Brigid M Lynch, Maike Neuhaus, Elizabeth G Eakin, David W Dunstan, Neville Owen, Brianna S Fjeldsoe

Journal: The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 2017;14(1):27

PMID: 28264684

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Stand Up Victoria multi-component intervention successfully reduced workplace sitting time in both the short (three months) and long (12 months) term. To further understand how this intervention worked, we aimed to assess the impact of the intervention on four social-cognitive constructs, and examined whether these constructs mediated intervention effects on workplace sitting time at 3 and 12 months post-baseline.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty one office-based workers (14 worksites, single government employer) were randomised to intervention or control conditions by worksite. The intervention comprised organisational, environmental, and individual level elements. Participant characteristics and social-cognitive constructs (perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy, perceived organisational norms and knowledge) were measured through a self-administered online survey at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. Workplace sitting time (min/8 h day) was measured with the activPAL3 device. Single multi-level mediation models were performed for each construct at both time points.

RESULTS

There were significant intervention effects at 3 months on perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy and perceived organisational norms. Effects on perceived organisational norms were not significant at 12 months. Perceived behavioural control significantly mediated intervention effects at 3 months, accounting for a small portion of the total effect (indirect effect: -8.6 min/8 h day, 95% CI: -18.5, -3.6 min; 7.5% of total effect). At 12 months, barrier self-efficacy significantly mediated the intervention effects on workplace sitting time (indirect effect: -10.3 min/8 h day, 95% CI: -27.3, -2.2; 13.9% of total effect). No significant effects were observed for knowledge at either time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies that aim to increase workers' perceived control and self-efficacy over their sitting time may be helpful components of sedentary behaviour interventions in the workplace. However, social-cognitive factors only partially explain variation in workplace sitting reduction. Understanding the importance of other levels of influence (particularly interpersonal and environmental) for initiating and maintaining workplace sedentary behaviour change will be informative for intervention development and refinement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials register ( ACTRN12611000742976 ) on 15 July 2011.

Address: Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. [email protected].; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. [email protected].; The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.; School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Melbourne School of Population & Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.; School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.