Newborn screening for Tyrosinemia type 1 using succinylacetone - a systematic review of test accuracy.

Chris Stinton, Julia Geppert, Karoline Freeman, Aileen Clarke, Samantha Johnson, Hannah Fraser, Paul Sutcliffe, Sian Taylor-Phillips

Journal: Orphanet journal of rare diseases 2018;12(1):48

PMID: 28274233

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tyrosinemia type 1 is an autosomal recessive disorder of amino acid metabolism. Without treatment, death in childhood is common. Treatment with nitisinone and dietary restrictions are associated with improved outcomes; some studies suggest better outcomes when treatment begins at an asymptomatic stage. Newborn screening allows for earlier identification, but there is uncertainty regarding the test accuracy of the current method: succinylacetone measurement in dried blood spots using tandem mass spectrometry.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of literature published up to January 2016. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, full texts, and conducted quality appraisals. A single reviewer extracted data, which was checked by a second reviewer.

RESULTS

Ten studies provided test accuracy data: five studies reporting screening experiences and five case-control studies. Sensitivity (29 cases in total) and specificity (34,403 controls in total) were 100% in the case-control studies, but could not be calculated in the studies reporting screening experiences due to a lack of follow-up of screen-negative babies. Positive predictive values in the screening experience studies ranged from 66.7% (2 true positive cases, 1 false positive case from ~500,000 people screened) to 100% (8 true positive cases from 856,671 people screened); negative predictive values could not be calculated. Positive and negative predictive values cannot be calculated from case-control studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for Tyrosinemia type 1 using tandem mass spectrometry measurement of succinylacetone from dried blood spots appears to be promising. Confirmation of test accuracy data should be obtained from studies that include a two-year follow-up of individuals who screen negative.

Address: Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England.; Warwick Library, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England.; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.