Randomized Phase II Trial of Parsatuzumab (Anti-EGFL7) or Placebo in Combination with FOLFOX and Bevacizumab for First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Guillem Argiles, Herbert Hurwitz, Ina Rhee, Daniel Chen, Weilan Ye, Priti Hegde, Eric Wakshull, Bruce McCall, Maria Anderson, Zev A Wainberg, Fernando Rivera, Fadi Braiteh, Niall Tebbutt, Ira Gore, Eric van Cutsem, Rocío García-Carbonero, Ilsung Chang, Mark Stroh, Roel Funke, Jacek Jassem

Journal: The oncologist 2018;22(4):375-e30

PMID: 28275117

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED

These negative phase II results for parsatuzumab highlight the challenges of developing an agent intended to enhance the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition without the benefit of validated pharmacodynamic biomarkers or strong predictive biomarker hypotheses.Any further clinical development of anti-EGFL7 is likely to require new mechanistic insights and biomarker development for antiangiogenic agents.

BACKGROUND

EGFL7 (epidermal growth factor-like domain 7) is a tumor-enriched vascular extracellular matrix protein that supports endothelial cell survival. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of parsatuzumab (also known as MEGF0444A), a humanized anti-EGFL7 IgG monoclonal antibody, in combination with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

One-hundred twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned to parsatuzumab, 400 mg, or placebo, in combination with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg. Treatment cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for a maximum of 24 months, with the exception of oxaliplatin, which was administered for up to 8 cycles.

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.93;  = .548). The median PFS was 12 months for the experimental arm versus 11.9 months for the control arm. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.46-2.1;  = .943). The overall response rate was 59% in the parsatuzumab arm and 64% in the placebo arm. The adverse event profile was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of efficacy for the addition of parsatuzumab to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy for first-line mCRC. 2017;22:375-e30.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Address: Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.; UZ Leuven Oncologie, Leuven, Belgium.; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.; Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.; Birmingham Hematology Oncology Associates, LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Austin Health, Medical Oncology, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Departamento de Oncología, Barcelona, Spain.; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.