Kohki Oikawa, Tadayoshi Kato, Kazumasa Oura, Shinsuke Narumi, Makoto Sasaki, Shunrou Fujiwara, Masakazu Kobayashi, Yoshiyasu Matsumoto, Jun-Ichi Nomura, Kenji Yoshida, Yasuo Terayama, Kuniaki Ogasawara
Journal: Atherosclerosis 2018;260():87-93
PMID: 28363131
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Emboli from the surgical site during exposure of the carotid arteries cause new cerebral ischemic lesions or neurological deficits after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of the cervical carotid arteries are associated with the development of microembolic signals (MES) on transcranial Doppler, during exposure of the arteries in CEA, and to compare the predictive accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings with that of gray-scale median (GSM).
METHODS
Seventy patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (≥70%) underwent preoperative cervical carotid artery ultrasound and CEA under transcranial Doppler monitoring of MES in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. Maximally enhanced intensities on the intraplaque and lumen time-intensity curves, respectively, were obtained from contrast-enhanced ultrasonography data, and the ratio of the maximal intensity (EI) of the intraplaque curve to that (EI) of the lumen curve was calculated. The GSM value of the plaque was also measured.
RESULTS
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to discriminate between the presence and absence of MES during exposure of the carotid arteries was significantly greater for EI/EI than for GSM (p = 0.0108). Multivariate statistical analysis demonstrated that only EI/EI was significantly associated with the development of MES during exposure of the carotid arteries (p = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of the cervical carotid arteries are associated with development of MES on transcranial Doppler during exposure of the arteries in CEA, and the predictive accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound is greater than that of GSM.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Full Text Sources:
Other Literature Sources:
Miscellaneous:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.