Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Rui Yang, Wan Tao, Yang-Yang Chen, Bing-Hong Zhang, Jun-Ming Tang, Sen Zhong, Xian-Xiang Chen

Journal: International journal of surgery (London, England) 2017;36(Pt A):274-282

PMID: 27840308

Free Full Text on Elsevier Science View on PubMed

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are a series of measures being taken during the perioperation to alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rate of patients. Although several studies reported the efficacy of ERAS in liver surgery, the role of ERAS in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear. This meta-analysis is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS programs versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wang Fang Database and VIP Database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical controlled trials (CCTs) concerning using ERAS in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Data collection ended in June 1st, 2016. The main end points were intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time, the cost of hospitalization, time to first flatus, the time to first diet after surgery, duration of postoperative hospital stay, total postoperative complication rate, gradeⅠcomplication rate, grade Ⅱ-Ⅴcomplication rate.

RESULTS

8 studies with 580 patients were eligible for analysis. There were 292 cases in ERAS group and 288 cases in traditional perioperative care (CTL) group. Compared with CTL group, ERAS group was associated with significantly accelerated of time to first diet after surgery (SMD = -1.79, 95%CI: -3.19 ∼ -0.38, P = 0.01), time to first flatus (MD = -0.51, 95%CI: -0.91 ∼ -0.12, P = 0.01). Meanwhile, it was associated with significantly decreased of duration of the postoperative hospital stay (MD = -3.31, 95%CI: -3.95 ∼ -2.67, P < 0.00001), cost of hospitalization (MD = -1.0, 95%CI: -1.49 ∼ -0.51, P < 0.0001), total postoperative complication rate (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.15-0.75, P = 0.008), gradeⅠcomplication rate (OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.22-0.64, P = 0.0003) and gradeⅡ-Ⅴcomplication rate (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.32-0.77, P = 0.002). Whereas there was no significantly difference in intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05), intraoperative blood transfusion (P > 0.05), operative time (P > 0.05) between ERAS group and CTL group.

CONCLUSION

Application of ERAS in laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and effective, and it could accelerate the postoperative recovery and lighten the financial burden of patients.

Address: Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Pediatric, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Pain, Puai Hospital, Wuhan, 430000, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Pediatric, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China. Electronic address: [email protected].

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.017