Photosynthetic responses mediate the adaptation of two Lotus japonicus ecotypes to low temperature.

Pablo Ignacio Calzadilla, Santiago Signorelli, Francisco Jose Escaray, Ana Bernardina Menéndez, Jorge Monza, Oscar Adolfo Ruiz, Santiago Javier Maiale

Journal: Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology 2017;250():59-68

PMID: 27457984

Abstract

Lotus species are important forage legumes due to their high nutritional value and adaptability to marginal conditions. However, the dry matter production and regrowth rate of cultivable Lotus spp. is drastically reduced during colder seasons. In this work, we evaluated the chilling response of Lotus japonicus ecotypes MG-1 and MG-20. No significant increases were observed in reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production or in lipid peroxidation, although a chilling-induced redox imbalance was suggested through NADPH/NADP(+) ratio alterations. Antioxidant enzyme catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activities were also measured. Superoxide dismutase, in particular the chloroplastic isoform, showed different activity for different ecotypes and treatments. Stress-induced photoinhibition also differentially influenced both ecotypes, with MG-1 more affected than MG-20. Data showed that the D2 PSII subunit was more affected than D1 after 1 d of low temperature exposure, although its protein levels recovered over the course of the experiment. Interestingly, D2 recovery was accompanied by improvements in photosynthetic parameters (Asat and Fv/Fm) and the NADPH/NADP(+) ratio. Our results suggest that the D2 protein is involved in the acclimation response of L. japonicus to low temperature. This may provide a deeper insight into the chilling tolerance mechanisms of the Lotus genus.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: UB1, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús, UNSAM-CONICET, Chascomús, Argentina. Electronic address: [email protected].; Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; School of Plant Biology and the UWA Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].; UB1, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús, UNSAM-CONICET, Chascomús, Argentina. Electronic address: [email protected].; Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, PROPLAME-PRHIDEB (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: [email protected].; Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. Electronic address: [email protected].; UB1, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús, UNSAM-CONICET, Chascomús, Argentina. Electronic address: [email protected].; UB1, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús, UNSAM-CONICET, Chascomús, Argentina. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.