Other supportive therapies in sepsis.

R P Dellinger, J Pérez

Journal: Intensive care medicine 2001;27 Suppl 1():S116-27

PMID: 11307367

Abstract

Patients who survive the circulatory and organ deficits in sepsis may still fall victim to complications such as pulmonary embolism and stress ulcer bleeding. Although there is no clearcut evidence to quantitate the impact of such complications on mortality, the anticipated impact is grave when considering the compromised physiological reserve of these patients. For this reason it is important to institute effective prophylaxis to minimize the impact. In addition, catabolism associated with sepsis likely influences the recovery of patients with sepsis and moreover can compromise the response of the immune system against an infectious insult. Early and adequate nutritional support therefore appears important. There is much controversy and lack of prospective research regarding effect of supportive therapies on outcome in patients with severe sepsis. This research is needed.

Address: Division of Cardiovascular and Critical Care Medicine, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill., USA.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.