Results at 2 Years after Gene Therapy for RPE65-Deficient Leber Congenital Amaurosis and Severe Early-Childhood-Onset Retinal Dystrophy.

Richard G Weleber, Mark E Pennesi, David J Wilson, Shalesh Kaushal, Laura R Erker, Lauren Jensen, Maureen T McBride, Terence R Flotte, Margaret Humphries, Roberto Calcedo, William W Hauswirth, Jeffrey D Chulay, J Timothy Stout

Journal: Ophthalmology 2017;123(7):1606-20

PMID: 27102010

Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide an initial assessment of the safety of a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector expressing RPE65 (rAAV2-CB-hRPE65) in adults and children with retinal degeneration caused by RPE65 mutations.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized, multicenter clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight adults and 4 children, 6 to 39 years of age, with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or severe early-childhood-onset retinal degeneration (SECORD).

METHODS

Patients received a subretinal injection of rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 in the poorer-seeing eye, at either of 2 dose levels, and were followed up for 2 years after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary safety measures were ocular and nonocular adverse events. Exploratory efficacy measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), static perimetry central 30° visual field hill of vision (V30) and total visual field hill of vision (VTOT), kinetic perimetry visual field area, and responses to a quality-of-life questionnaire.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated subretinal injections and there were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Common adverse events were those associated with the surgical procedure and included subconjunctival hemorrhage in 8 patients and ocular hyperemia in 5 patients. In the treated eye, BCVA increased in 5 patients, V30 increased in 6 patients, VTOT increased in 5 patients, and kinetic visual field area improved in 3 patients. One subject showed a decrease in BCVA and 2 patients showed a decrease in kinetic visual field area.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 was not associated with serious adverse events, and improvement in 1 or more measures of visual function was observed in 9 of 12 patients. The greatest improvements in visual acuity were observed in younger patients with better baseline visual acuity. Evaluation of more patients and a longer duration of follow-up will be needed to determine the rate of uncommon or rare side effects or safety concerns.

Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Casey Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: [email protected].; Casey Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.; Office of the Dean, University of Massachusetts, Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.; Gene Therapy Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.; Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Alachua, Florida.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.