Focal salvage therapy for local prostate cancer recurrences after primary radiotherapy: a comprehensive review.

D A Smit Duijzentkunst, M Peters, J R N van der Voort van Zyp, M A Moerland, M van Vulpen

Journal: World journal of urology 2017;34(11):1521-1531

PMID: 27012712

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM

Patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be eligible for salvage treatment. Whole-gland salvage techniques carry a high risk of toxicity. A focal salvage approach might reduce the risk of adverse events while maintaining cancer control in carefully selected patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate current literature to assess whether focal salvage leads to a comparable or favourable recurrence rate and less toxicity compared to whole-gland salvage.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. A total of 3015 articles were screened and assessed for quality. Eight papers [on focal cryoablation (n = 3), brachytherapy (n = 3) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (n = 2)] were used to report outcomes.

RESULTS

One-, 2-, 3- and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) ranges for focal salvage are, respectively, 69-100, 49-100, 50-91 and 46.5-54.5 %. Severe genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual function toxicity rates are 0-33.3 %. One study directly compares focal to whole-gland salvage cryotherapy, showing 5-year BDFS of, respectively, 54.4 and 86.5 % with lower toxicity rates for focal salvage patients.

CONCLUSION

Provisional data suggest that BDFS rates of focal salvage are in line with those of whole-gland approaches. There is evidence that focal salvage could decrease severe toxicity and preserve erectile function.

Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Q.02.2.314, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Q.02.2.314, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.