Improving the effect of shear on skin viability with wound dressings.

L A de Wert, L Schoonhoven, J H C H Stegen, A A Piatkowski, R R van der Hulst, M Poeze, N D Bouvy

Journal: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2017;60():505-514

PMID: 27031685

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are a major healthcare problem and caused by pressure and shear-forces. Although shear-force is understood to be a major contributing factor, no preventive interventions are specifically aimed at relieving the effect of shear on skin to improve skin viability.

METHODS

A physical model was used to apply a combined loading of 2.4kPa pressure and 14.5N shear-force on skin in humans. Loading was applied on the volar aspect of both forearms for 30min in ten healthy volunteers. One arm received loading on skin with a wound dressing, the other arm (control) received loading directly on skin. The following parameters were determined before and after loading: IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio (used as a measure of skin damage); Cutaneous blood cell flux ((CBF) measure of reactive hyperaemia); Lactate concentration (measure of tissue ischemia). Three different dressings were tested on three different days. The order of dressing application, dressing arm and start of the intervention were randomized.

RESULTS

Participants mean age was 22.5±1.6 year with a BMI of 22.3±2.4kg/m(2). IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio of the skin was significantly lower after the application of pressure and shear when the Mepilex® (P<0.01), Allevyn (P<0.05) or Aquacel(TM) dressing (P<0.01) was used compared with the control measurement. The Mepilex® dressing was more effective in reducing post-load IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio compared to the Allevyn dressing (P<0.01). Post-load CBF was significantly lower when the Mepilex® or Aquacel dressing was used (P<0.001). Both dressings induced significantly less post-load CBF than the Allevyn dressing (P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). The concentration of lactate was not significantly increased after the application of pressure and shear and could not be used as a measure with this model.

CONCLUSION

This is the first in vivo study to demonstrate that the effects of pressure in combination with shear on skin viability can be improved with foam dressings. In this study, the multi-layered dressings perform better than the single-layered dressing.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Electronic address: [email protected].; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.; Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.