A common clinical dilemma: Management of abnormal vaginal cytology and human papillomavirus test results.

Michelle J Khan, L Stewart Massad, Walter Kinney, Michael A Gold, E J Mayeaux, Teresa M Darragh, Philip E Castle, David Chelmow, Herschel W Lawson, Warner K Huh

Journal: Gynecologic oncology 2017;141(2):364-370

PMID: 26915529

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal cancer is an uncommon cancer of the lower genital tract, and standardized screening is not recommended. Risk factors for vaginal cancer include a history of other lower genital tract neoplasia or cancer, smoking, immunosuppression, and exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Although cervical cancer screening after total hysterectomy for benign disease is not recommended, many women inappropriately undergo vaginal cytology and/or human papillomavirus (hrHPV) tests, and clinicians are faced with managing their abnormal results. Our objective is to review the literature on vaginal cytology and hrHPV testing and to develop guidance for the management of abnormal vaginal screening tests.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed database through 2015 was performed. Articles describing vaginal cytology or vaginal hrHPV testing were reviewed, and diagnostic accuracy of these tests when available was noted.

RESULTS

The available literature was too limited to develop evidence-based recommendations for managing abnormal vaginal cytology and hrHPV screening tests. However, the data did show that 1) the risk of vaginal cancer in women after hysterectomy is extremely low, justifying the recommendation against routine screening, and 2) in women for whom surveillance is recommended, e.g. women post-treatment for cervical precancer or cancer, hrHPV testing may be useful in identification of vaginal cancer precursors.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal cancer is rare, and asymptomatic low-risk women should not be screened. An algorithm based on expert opinion is proposed for managing women with abnormal vaginal test results.

Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Division of Women's Reproductive Healthcare, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.; Department of Women's Health, The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, USA.; Tulsa Cancer Institute, University of Oklahoma, School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, OK, USA.; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.; Department of Clinical Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.