MAOIs - does the evidence warrant their resurrection?

David Menkes, Peter Bosanac, David Castle

Journal: Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2018;24(4):371-3

PMID: 26917855

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The place of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in psychiatry is reviewed, and the question posed as to whether they are now justifiably disregarded by prescribers.

METHOD

Multiple databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane) were interrogated to provide an overview regarding the use, efficacy and toxicity of MAOIs. Data regarding funded use of these agents in New Zealand were obtained from PHARMAC.

RESULTS

Evidence supports the use of MAOIs in major depressive disorder, certain anxiety disorders and, to lesser extent, bipolar depression. Older non-selective agents, such as phenelzine and tranylcypromine, have distinctive efficacy in 'atypical' and treatment-resistant depression, but at the cost of serious tolerability problems. Their relegation and perception by clinicians as 'last resort' medications - if considered at all - has occurred in the context of various concerns, notably dietary restrictions, potential adverse drug interactions and the usual requirement for divided doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient evidence supports consideration of MAOIs in treatment-refractory and atypical depressive disorders, and in social anxiety disorder. Psychiatrists in training need to gain experience in using these agents.

© The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2016.

Address: Associate Professor, Psychiatry, Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand [email protected].; Clinical Director, Mental Health and Aged Care Services, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, and; Associate Professor, Department Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Chair of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, and; Professor, Department Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.