Jong Pil Yoon, Seok Won Chung, Ju-Eun Kim, Hyung Sup Kim, Hyun-Joo Lee, Won-Ju Jeong, Kyung-Soo Oh, Dong-Oh Lee, Anna Seo, Youngjun Kim
Journal: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2016;25(3):376-83
PMID: 26927433
BACKGROUND
The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy of 3 injection methods, intra-articular injection, subacromial injection, and hydrodilatation (HD), in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder.
METHODS
Patients with primary frozen shoulder were randomized to undergo intra-articular injection (n = 29), subacromial injection (n = 29), or HD (n = 28). Evaluations using a visual analog scale for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, and passive range of shoulder motion were completed before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment.
RESULTS
Among the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder, HD resulted in a greater range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation, a lower visual analog scale score for pain after 1 month, and better outcomes for all functional scores after 1 month and 3 months of follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in any clinical outcomes among the 3 groups in the final follow-up at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Although HD yielded more rapid improvement, the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder resulted in similar clinical improvement in the final follow-up at 6 months.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Medical:
Other Literature Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.