A protocol for a randomised clinical trial of the effect of providing feedback on inhaler technique and adherence from an electronic device in patients with poorly controlled severe asthma.

Jansen Seheult, Richard W Costello, Richard B Reilly, Isabelle Killane, Greg Diette, Gloria Crispino, Abhilash Sahadevan, Stephen J Lane, Eoin Hunt, Desmond Murphy, Imran Sulaiman, Aoife Breathnach, Frank Doyle, Viliam Rapcan, Terrence Taylor, Shona D'Arcy, Cian Hughes, Martin Holmes, Elaine Mac Hale

Journal: BMJ open 2016;6(1):e009350

PMID: 26729384

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In clinical practice, it is difficult to distinguish between patients with refractory asthma from those with poorly controlled asthma, where symptoms persist due to poor adherence, inadequate inhaler technique or comorbid diseases. We designed an audio recording device which, when attached to an inhaler, objectively identifies the time and technique of inhaler use, thereby assessing both aspects of adherence. This study will test the hypothesis that feedback on these two aspects of adherence when passed on to patients improves adherence and helps clinicians distinguish refractory from difficult-to-control asthma.

METHODS

This is a single, blind, prospective, randomised, clinical trial performed at 5 research centres. Patients with partially controlled or uncontrolled severe asthma who have also had at least one severe asthma exacerbation in the prior year are eligible to participate. The effect of two types of nurse-delivered education interventions to promote adherence and inhaler technique will be assessed. The active group will receive feedback on their inhaler technique and adherence from the new device over a 3-month period. The control group will also receive training in inhaler technique and strategies to promote adherence, but no feedback from the device. The primary outcome is the difference in actual adherence, a measure that incorporates time and technique of inhaler use between groups at the end of the third month. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients who remain refractory despite good adherence, and differences in the components of adherence after the intervention. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol basis. The sample size is 220 subjects (110 in each group), and loss to follow-up is estimated at 10% which will allow results to show a 10% difference (0.8 power) in adherence between group means with a type I error probability of 0.05.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01529697; Pre-results.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Address: Clinical Research Centre, Smurfit Building Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.; Department of Bioengineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland.; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.