Randomized, controlled, two-arm, interventional, multicenter study on risk-adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple-trauma patients.

Dieter Rixen, Eva Steinhausen, Stefan Sauerland, Rolf Lefering, Marc G Maegele, Bertil Bouillon, Guido Grass, Edmund A M Neugebauer

Journal: Trials 2016;17():47

PMID: 26809247

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long bone fractures, particularly of the femur, are common in multiple-trauma patients, but their optimal management has not yet been determined. Although a trend exists toward the concept of "damage control orthopedics" (DCO), current literature is inconclusive. Thus, a need exists for a more specific controlled clinical study. The primary objective of this study was to clarify whether a risk-adapted procedure for treating femoral fractures, as opposed to an early definitive treatment strategy, leads to an improved outcome (morbidity and mortality).

METHODS/DESIGN

The study was designed as a randomized controlled multicenter study. Multiple-trauma patients with femur shaft fractures and a calculated probability of death of 20 to 60 % were randomized to either temporary fracture fixation with external fixation and defined secondary definitive treatment (DCO) or primary reamed nailing (early total care). The primary objective was to reduce the extent of organ failure as measured by the maximum sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were randomized to two groups of 17 patients each. Both groups were comparable regarding sex, age, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale, prothrombin time, base excess, calculated probability of death, and other physiologic variables. The maximum SOFA score was comparable (nonsignificant) between the groups. Regarding the secondary endpoints, the patients with external fixation required a significantly longer ventilation period (p = 0.049) and stayed on the intensive care significantly longer (p = 0.037), whereas the in-hospital length of stay was balanced for both groups. Unfortunately, the study had to be terminated prior to reaching the anticipated sample size because of unexpected low patient recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the results of this randomized study reflect the ambivalence in the literature. No advantage of the damage control concept could be detected in the treatment of femur fractures in multiple-trauma patients. The necessity for scientific evaluation of this clinically relevant question remains.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10321620 Date assigned: 9 February 2007.

Address: Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Germany. [email protected].; Witten-Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany. [email protected].; Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Germany.; Witten-Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany.; Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten-Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.; Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Witten-Herdecke at the Hospital Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.; Office of the Ethics Committee, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.