José Luis Domínguez Jiménez, Antonio Fernández Suárez, Aurora Úrsula Muñoz Colmenero, Daniel Fatela Cantillo, Iratxe López Pelayo
Journal: Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2018;36(2):471-476
PMID: 26847948
BACKGROUND & AIMS
There is no consensus on the most accurate method to diagnose primary hypolactasia. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the new gaxilose test with 2 traditional tests (lactose tolerance test and clinical criteria) for the diagnosis of primary hypolactasia using the C/T-13910 polymorphism as a reference standard.
METHODS
Patients with a clinical suspicion of lactose intolerance were subjected to gaxilose tests, shortened lactose tolerance tests, and symptom questionnaires before and after overload with 50 g lactose and after a lactose-free diet. The diagnostic accuracy and degree of agreement and correlation were assessed using a genetic test (C/T-13910 polymorphism) as a reference standard and their respective 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Thirty consecutive patients (70% women) participated in the study. The genetic test confirmed the C/T-13910 polymorphism in 11 patients (36.8%). The presence of diarrhoea and the symptom score after lactose overload, along with the tolerance test, were the variables with the highest degree of agreement (κ > 0.60). Area under the ROC curve was >0.82 (p < 0.05), with sensitivity and specificity values of >0.80. However, the gaxilose test obtained lower values: κ, 0.47; area under curve, 0.75 (0.57-0.94); sensitivity, 0.82 (0.55-1); and specificity, 0.68 (0.45-0.92). The multivariate analysis showed an association between the post-overload symptom questionnaire and the results of the genetic test (odds ratio: 1.17; 1.04-1.31; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of diarrhoea and the symptom score after overload with 50 g lactose showed a higher degree of agreement and diagnostic accuracy for primary hypolactasia than the gaxilose test when the genetic test is used as a reference standard.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Medical:
Other Literature Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.