Christian Agebratt, Edvin Ström, Thobias Romu, Olof Dahlqvist-Leinhard, Magnus Borga, Per Leandersson, Fredrik H Nystrom
Journal: PloS one 2016;11(1):e0147149
PMID: 26788923
Fruits and vegetables intake has been advocated to improve blood lipids profile and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. However, a low fat diet rich in fruits and vegetables has showed no effect on cardiovascular disease and cancer in a large randomized American trial. This might be due to the high sugar content in fruits, particularly fructose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adding either fruits or nuts to the diet of 30 healthy non-obese individuals on liver fat, metabolic rate and cardiovascular risk markers. Authors concluded that the trial only showed small effects on cardiovascular risk factors. Nevertheless, there was a significant change in lipoprotein (fats that transport fats in the blood) levels between the two groups, which tends to give an advantage to the consumption of nuts over fruits. They deduced that increased intake of fruits doesn’t negatively impact cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy non-obese individuals. However, further research needs to evaluate the effects on obese and insulin-resistant participants.
BACKGROUND
Fruit has since long been advocated as a healthy source of many nutrients, however, the high content of sugars in fruit might be a concern.
OBJECTIVES
To study effects of an increased fruit intake compared with similar amount of extra calories from nuts in humans.
METHODS
Thirty healthy non-obese participants were randomized to either supplement the diet with fruits or nuts, each at +7 kcal/kg bodyweight/day for two months. Major endpoints were change of hepatic fat content (HFC, by magnetic resonance imaging, MRI), basal metabolic rate (BMR, with indirect calorimetry) and cardiovascular risk markers.
RESULTS
Weight gain was numerically similar in both groups although only statistically significant in the group randomized to nuts (fruit: from 22.15 ± 1.61 kg/m(2) to 22.30 ± 1.7 kg/m(2), p = 0.24 nuts: from 22.54 ± 2.26 kg/m(2) to 22.73 ± 2.28 kg/m(2), p = 0.045). On the other hand BMR increased in the nut group only (p = 0.028). Only the nut group reported a net increase of calories (from 2519 ± 721 kcal/day to 2763 ± 595 kcal/day, p = 0.035) according to 3-day food registrations. Despite an almost three-fold reported increased fructose-intake in the fruit group (from 9.1 ± 6.0 gram/day to 25.6 ± 9.6 gram/day, p<0.0001, nuts: from 12.4 ± 5.7 gram/day to 6.5 ± 5.3 gram/day, p = 0.007) there was no change of HFC. The numerical increase in fasting insulin was statistically significant only in the fruit group (from 7.73±3.1 mIE/L to 8.81±2.9 mIE/L, p = 0.018, nuts: from 7.29±2.9 mIE/L to 8.62±3.0 mIE/L, p = 0.14). Levels of vitamin C increased in both groups while α-tocopherol/cholesterol-ratio increased only in the fruit group.
CONCLUSIONS
Although BMR increased in the nut-group only this was not linked with differences in weight gain between groups which potentially could be explained by the lack of reported net caloric increase in the fruit group. In healthy non-obese individuals an increased fruit intake seems safe from cardiovascular risk perspective, including measurement of HFC by MRI.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02227511.
Full Text Sources:
Medical:
Other Literature Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.