Long-term outcomes of phakic patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants.

Y Yang, C Bailey, F G Holz, N Eter, M Weber, C Baker, S Kiss, U Menchini, J M Ruiz Moreno, P Dugel, A Lotery

Journal: Eye (London, England) 2016;29(9):1173-80

PMID: 26113503

Abstract

PURPOSE

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause of blindness in working-age adults. Slow-release, nonbioerodible fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants have shown efficacy in the treatment of DMO; however, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends that FAc should be used in patients with chronic DMO considered insufficiently responsive to other available therapies only if the eye to be treated is pseudophakic. The goal of this analysis was to examine treatment outcomes in phakic patients who received 0.2 μg/day FAc implant.

METHODS

This analysis of the phase 3 FAME (Fluocinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema) data examines the safety and efficacy of FAc implants in patients who underwent cataract extraction before (cataract before implant (CBI) group) or after (cataract after implant (CAI) group) receiving the implant. The data were further examined by DMO duration.

RESULTS

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 36 months was comparable in the CAI and CBI groups. Both the percentage of patients gaining ≥ 3 lines of vision and mean change in BCVA letter score were numerically greater in the CAI group. In addition, most patients who underwent cataract surgery experienced a net gain in BCVA from presurgery baseline as well as from original study baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of 0.2 μg/day FAc implants in phakic as well as in pseudophakic patients. These findings will serve as a pilot for design of future studies to evaluate the potential protective effect of FAc implants before cataract surgery in patients with DMO and cataract.

Address: Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.; University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.; University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.; University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany.; University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.; Paducah Retinal Center, Paducah, KY, USA.; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.; Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.; University Castilla La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.; Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.