Impact of a simulation training curriculum on technical and nontechnical skills in colonoscopy: a randomized trial.

Samir C Grover, Ankit Garg, Michael A Scaffidi, Jeffrey J Yu, Ian S Plener, Elaine Yong, Maria Cino, Teodor P Grantcharov, Catharine M Walsh

Journal: Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2016;82(6):1072-9

PMID: 26007221

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GI endoscopy simulation-based training augments early clinical performance; however, the optimal manner by which to deliver training is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate a simulation-based structured comprehensive curriculum (SCC) designed to teach technical, cognitive, and integrative competencies in colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Endoscopic simulation course at an academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty-three novice endoscopists were allocated to an SCC group or self-regulated learning (SRL) group. The SCC group received a curriculum consisting of 6 hours of didactic lectures and 8 hours of virtual reality simulation-based training with expert feedback. The SRL group was provided a list of desired objectives and was instructed to practice on the simulator for an equivalent time (8 hours).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Clinical transfer was assessed during 2 patient colonoscopies using the Joint Advisory Group Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG DOPS) scale. Secondary outcome measures included differences in procedural knowledge, immediate post-training simulation performance, and delayed post-training (4-6 weeks) performance during an integrated scenario test on the JAG DOPS communication and integrated scenario global rating scales.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline or post-training performance on the simulator task. The SCC group performed superiorly during their first and second clinical colonoscopies. Additionally, the SCC group demonstrated significantly better knowledge and colonoscopy-specific performance, communication, and global performance during the integrated scenario.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to measure SRL participants' effort outside of mandatory training. In addition, feedback metrics and number of available simulation cases are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support integration of endoscopy simulation into a structured curriculum incorporating instructional feedback and complementary didactic knowledge as a means to augment technical, cognitive, and integrative skills acquisition, as compared with SRL on virtual reality simulators. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01991522.)

Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, and the Learning Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.