Suvajyoti Guha, Andrés Mejía-Alfaro, Prasanna Hariharan, Matthew R Myers
Journal: American journal of infection control 2016;43(8):871-7
PMID: 26022658
BACKGROUND
In the event of a public-health threat involving bioaerosols, such as a terrorist attack or pandemic, options for devices to protect the pediatric population are limited. One strategy involves deployment of facemasks meant for the pediatric population, although protection against bioaerosols was not an intended use of such masks and little is known about their effectiveness.
METHODS
We chose 3 brands of facemasks for pediatric use for characterizing penetration. To validate our experimental technique, 2 N95 respirator brands were also tested. All barriers were subjected to neutralized polydispersed sodium chloride aerosols, and their intrinsic penetration was evaluated in the submicron size range at different flow rates.
RESULTS
As expected, the N95 brands had low penetration (5% or less) at the highest flow rates. However, for the facemasks for pediatric use, penetration varied significantly amongst brands at the highest flow rates (~15%->50%). Studies with isopropanol-dipped respirators and facemasks demonstrated that not all brands of facemasks for pediatric use have electret layers.
CONCLUSIONS
Our bench tests suggest that the intrinsic penetration through facemasks for pediatric use can be high in the submicron size range. These data can be used in risk-assessment models to determine the extent to which facemasks for pediatric use reduce the likelihood of infection in emergency situations.
Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. All rights reserved.
Medical:
Research Materials:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.