Nutrition-related policy and environmental strategies to prevent obesity in rural communities: a systematic review of the literature, 2002-2013.

Jared McGuirt, Alice Ammerman, Lauren Whetstone, Emilee Quinn, Courtney Pinard, Emily Piltch, Jane Kolodinsky, Donna Johnson, Wesley Dean, Ellen Barnidge, Larissa Calancie, Clint Owens, Carmen Byker, Michelle Schreiner, Kelly R Evenson, Sheila Fleischhacker, Laura Kettel Khan, Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts, Jennifer Leeman

Journal: Preventing chronic disease 2016;12():E57

PMID: 25927605

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Residents of rural communities in the United States are at higher risk for obesity than their urban and suburban counterparts. Policy and environmental-change strategies supporting healthier dietary intake can prevent obesity and promote health equity. Evidence in support of these strategies is based largely on urban and suburban studies; little is known about use of these strategies in rural communities. The purpose of this review was to synthesize available evidence on the adaptation, implementation, and effectiveness of policy and environmental obesity-prevention strategies in rural settings.

METHODS

The review was guided by a list of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommended Community Strategies and Measurements to Prevent Obesity in the United States, commonly known as the "COCOMO" strategies. We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Public Affairs Information Service, and Cochrane databases for articles published from 2002 through 2013 that reported findings from research on nutrition-related policy and environmental strategies in rural communities in the United States and Canada. Two researchers independently abstracted data from each article, and resolved discrepancies by consensus.

RESULTS

Of the 663 articles retrieved, 33 met inclusion criteria. The interventions most commonly focused on increasing access to more nutritious foods and beverages or decreasing access to less nutritious options. Rural adaptations included accommodating distance to food sources, tailoring to local food cultures, and building community partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this literature review provide guidance on adapting and implementing policy and environmental strategies in rural communities.

Address: Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, CB No 7426, 1700 MLK/Airport Rd, Room 239, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426. Telephone: 315-350-1689. Email: [email protected].; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.; East Carolina University, Elizabeth City, North Carolina.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, Georgia.; National Institutes of Health, Division on Nutrition Research Coordination, Bethesda, Maryland.; Montana State University, Billings, Montana; Ellen Barnidge, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.; Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.; US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service, Washington, DC.; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.; University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.; Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.; University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.