Comparison of treatment with preservative-free versus preserved sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops after cataract surgery in patients with preexisting dry-eye syndrome.

Donghyun Jee, Minji Park, Hee Jin Lee, Man Soo Kim, Eun Chul Kim

Journal: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2015;41(4):756-63

PMID: 25487027

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare treatment with preservative-free and preserved sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops after cataract surgery in patients with preexisting dry-eye syndrome.

SETTING

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

METHODS

Patients with cataract and dry-eye syndrome were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 patients were treated with preservative-free sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and preservative-free fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops 4 times a day in the first month and twice a day in the second month. Group 2 patients were treated with preserved eyedrops using the same schedule. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, tear-film breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining, impression cytology, and antioxidant and inflammatory cytokine activities in tears were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both groups comprised 40 patients. At 2 months, the OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer I score, fluorescein staining score, impression cytology findings, and goblet cell count were significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P<.05). The interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations were significantly less in the tears of Group 1 patients than in the tears of Group 2 patients, and catalase and superoxide dismutase 2 fluorescence intensities were significantly greater in the tears of Group 1 patients than in the tears of Group 2 patients (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preservative-free sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops can improve the symptoms and signs of dry-eye syndrome after cataract surgery. Preservative-free fluorometholone eyedrops may have antiinflammatory and antioxidant effects in tears of patients with dry-eye syndrome.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: From the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Jee, Park, M.S. Kim, E.C. Kim) and the Institute of Clinical Medicine Research (Lee), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.; From the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Jee, Park, M.S. Kim, E.C. Kim) and the Institute of Clinical Medicine Research (Lee), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.