Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review.

Allison Tong, Shingisai Chando, Sally Crowe, Braden Manns, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Jonathan C Craig

Journal: American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2015;65(5):674-83

PMID: 25582284

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resources for research are insufficient to cover all unanswered questions, and therefore difficult choices about allocation must be made. Recently there has been a move toward more patient-centered research. This study aims to evaluate approaches to research prioritization in kidney disease and describe research priorities of patients with kidney disease, their caregivers, the health care providers involved in their care, and policy makers.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & POPULATION

Studies that elicited patient, caregiver, health care provider, or policy maker priorities for research in kidney disease were included.

SEARCH STRATEGY & SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched to May 2014.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Descriptive synthesis.

RESULTS

We identified 16 studies (n=2,365 participants) conducted in the United States, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, and internationally. Only 4 (25%) studies explicitly involved patients. Various priority-setting methods were used, including the Delphi technique, expert panels, consensus conference, ranking or voting surveys, focus groups, and interviews, of which the process was described in detail by 11 (69%) studies. The priority areas for research most frequently identified across studies were prevention of acute kidney injury, prevention of chronic kidney disease progression, fluid and diet restrictions, improving vascular access, kidney transplant survival, access to transplantation, patient education, and psychosocial impact of chronic kidney disease.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies were conducted in high-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The priorities identified by kidney disease research priority-setting exercises are broad ranging, but patient involvement is uncommon and the processes often are incompletely described. Establishing research priorities using a prespecified and transparent process that engages patients, caregivers, and health care providers is needed to ensure that resources are invested to answer questions that address the shared priorities in kidney disease.

Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.; Crowe Associates Ltd, Oxon, United Kingdom.; Department of Medicine, Libin Cardiovascular Institute and Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute and Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.; Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.