Birth data accessibility via primary care health records to classify health status in a multi-ethnic population of children: an observational study.

Rachel Bonner, Vassiliki Bountziouka, Janet Stocks, Seeromanie Harding, Angela Wade, Chris Griffiths, David Sears, Helen Fothergill, Hannah Slevin, Sooky Lum

Journal: NPJ primary care respiratory medicine 2015;25():14112

PMID: 25612149

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to reliable birth data (birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA)) is essential for the identification of individuals who are at subsequent health risk.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore the feasibility of retrospectively collecting birth data for schoolchildren from parental questionnaires (PQ) and general practitioners (GPs) in primary care clinics, in inner city neighbourhoods with high density of ethnic minority and disadvantaged populations.

METHODS

Attempts were made to obtain birth data from parents and GPs for 2,171 London primary schoolchildren (34% White, 29% Black African origin, 25% South Asians, 12% Other) as part of a larger study of respiratory health.

RESULTS

Information on BW and/or GA were obtained from parents for 2,052 (95%) children. Almost all parents (2,045) gave consent to access their children's health records held by GPs. On the basis of parental information, GPs of 1,785 children were successfully contacted, and GPs of 1,202 children responded. Birth data were retrieved for only 482 children (22% of 2,052). Missing birth data from GPs were associated with non-white ethnicity, non-UK born, English not the dominant language at home or socioeconomic disadvantage. Paired data were available in 376 children for BW and in 407 children for GA. No significant difference in BW or GA was observed between PQ and GP data, with <5% difference between sources regardless of normal or low birth weight, or term or preterm status.

CONCLUSIONS

Parental recall of birth data for primary schoolchildren yields high quality and rapid return of data, and it should be considered as a viable alternative in which there is limited access to birth records. It provides the potential to include children with an increased risk of health problems within epidemiological studies.

Address: Respiratory, Critical Care & Anaesthesia Section (Portex Unit), UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.; MRC/CSO, Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.; Clinical Epidemiology, Nutrition and Biostatistics Section, UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.; Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.; 1] Respiratory, Critical Care & Anaesthesia Section (Portex Unit), UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK [2] Lung Function Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.; 1] Respiratory, Critical Care & Anaesthesia Section (Portex Unit), UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK [2] Torbay Hospital, South Devon NHS Trust, Torquay, Devon, UK.; 1] Respiratory, Critical Care & Anaesthesia Section (Portex Unit), UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK [2] Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.