Hasssan Abolhassani, Mohammad Hossein Asgardoon, Nima Rezaei, Lennart Hammarstrom, Asghar Aghamohammadi
Journal: Expert review of clinical immunology 2016;11(11):1229-43
PMID: 26289377
Immunoglobulin (IG) replacement therapy has served as lifesaving treatment in primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) for more than six decades. Approximately 70% of patients with PID require IG replacement to maintain their health during the course of disease. It is estimated that about one-third of IG products is used for replacement therapy in these patients. On the other hand, the introduction of newer IG preparations is continuing to improve and extend the quality of life in PID patients. Because of the options available including concentrations, formulations, osmolality, product stabilizers, sodium concentration, anti-infective activity, IgA content and pH, it is important to match the PID patient's complications with potential side effects associated with the composition of a particular IG product. The purpose of this review is to present the clinical differences of intravenous IG among the various preparations regarding PID patients.
Miscellaneous:
Full Text Sources:
Other Literature Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.