Effect of knee brace type on braking response time during automobile driving.

Dietmar Dammerer, Johannes M Giesinger, Rainer Biedermann, Christian Haid, Martin Krismer, Michael Liebensteiner

Journal: Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 2015;31(3):404-9

PMID: 25442646

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess driving ability (brake response time [BRT]) with commonly used knee braces.

METHODS

Sixty-four healthy participants (32 women and 32 men) participated in our study. BRT was assessed using a custom-made driving simulator. We assessed BRT for 5 different commonly used knee braces (right leg) used in 9 different settings: without a knee brace (control group); with a typical postoperative knee brace with adjustable range of motion (ROM) and the settings of 0° to 30°, 0° to 60°, 0° to 90°, and 20° to 90° (extension and flexion); and with an unloading knee brace for moderate to severe unicompartmental osteoarthritis, an orthosis for ligament instabilities, a knee brace for patellofemoral disorders, and an elastic knee bandage.

RESULTS

The 64 participants (mean age, 33.5 years) showed significantly impaired BRT with the typical postoperative brace set at an ROM of 0° to 30° (673 milliseconds, P < .001), ROM of 0° to 60° (629 milliseconds, P < .001), ROM of 0° to 90° (607 milliseconds, P = .001), and ROM of 20° to 90° (602 milliseconds, P = .005) compared with the control group. However, no such impaired BRT was found for any other investigated knee brace.

CONCLUSIONS

Right-sided ROM-restricting knee braces involve significant impairment of BRT in healthy participants. No such prolonged BRT was found for a patellofemoral realignment brace, a ligament brace, a valgus/osteoarthritis brace, or an elastic knee bandage. However, our findings should be viewed in light of the limitations of the study, which are (1) the lack of a defined decrease in BRT that could lead to an accident and (2) uncertainty of whether the statistical differences are also clinically important.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial.

Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.