Tolerance of formulas containing prebiotics in healthy, term infants.

Timberly Williams, Yong Choe, Pamela Price, Gary Katz, Fabrizis Suarez, Charles Paule, Amy Mackey

Journal: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2015;59(5):653-8

PMID: 25061716

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare infants' gastrointestinal tolerance of formulas supplemented with 2 different levels of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) versus a control formula (CF) or human milk.

METHODS

Healthy, full-term infants (n = 180) were enrolled in this 3-group controlled, double-blind, multicenter study, and a concurrently enrolled, nonrandomized human milk-fed group (HM) by 8 days of age. Infants were randomized to be fed formula supplemented with either 4 g (EF4) or 8 g (EF8) GOS/L or a CF until day of life (DOL) 119. Infants were to be seen at DOL 14, 35, 56, 84, and 119. Parents were to record detailed 24-hour information about intake, tolerance to feedings, and stool patterns and consistency each day from enrollment to DOL 35, and for 3 days before DOL 56, 84, and 119. Stool consistency was scored on a 5-point scale as watery (1), loose/mushy, soft, formed, or hard (5).

RESULTS

The mean stool consistency score was higher in the CF group throughout the study (CF >  EF8 and CF > HM for all study periods and CF > EF4 from DOL 15 to 35, P < 0.05). There was a significantly higher percentage of watery stools in the EF8 versus the CF group from study day 1 (SD 1) to DOL 14 (P < 0.05), but no differences between the groups in number of stools per day. The percentage of feedings with spit up and/or vomiting within 1 hour after feeding was significantly lower for HM versus EF8 and CF from SD 1 to DOL 14 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical study, milk-based term infant formula (Similac Advance) with 4 g GOS/L was well-tolerated in terms of stool consistency and additional measures of gastrointestinal tolerance by newborn infants through the first 4 months of life.

Address: Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.