Dermatopharmacokinetic bioequivalence study of two types of topical patches containing loxoprofen sodium.

Xia Chen, Qian Zhao, Ei Hitsu, Ji Jiang, Wen Zhong, Takayasu Matsuzawa, Pei Hu

Journal: International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2016;52(10):927-32

PMID: 25250614

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the bioequivalence of two types of topical loxoprofen patches, LX-A and LX-P, in healthy Chinese volunteers through a dermatopharmacokinetic approach.

METHOD

Based on a pilot study, this study was designed as an open-label, self-controlled trial in 20 males. Subjects received application of two 3.2 x 3.2 cm(2) pieces of LX-A and LX-P patches on their backs at randomly assigned positions simultaneously. Stratum corneum (SC) samples were taken with adhesive stripping tapes prior to patch application and at 20 hours and 24 hours postdose following removal of each loxoprofen patch, respectively. Bioassay was performed with a validated high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Bioequivalence was evaluated through a power model on the total amount of loxoprofen at each post-application point and on the percentage change of SC loxoprofen content between the two time-points.

RESULTS

Mean (± standard deviation) total amount of SC-sampled loxoprofen was similar between LX-A and LX-P at 20 hours (38,722 ± 7,171 ng vs. 39,309 ± 9,688 ng) and 24 hours (36,638 ± 8,149 ng vs. 37,426 ± 9,029 ng) post-administration. The corresponding point estimate (90% confidence interval, 90%CI) of LX-P to LX-A was 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) and 1.02 (0.93, 1.12), respectively. In addition, the 24 hour/20 hour ratio for SC content of loxoprofen was statistically comparable between LX-A and LX-P, with both the point estimate and the 90% CI falling into the range of (0.80, 1.25).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that LX-P and LX-A are two bioequivalent topical formulations of loxoprofen.

Link outs

Free resources

Other Literature Sources:

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.