Simple versus double jejunal pouch for reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

M A Gioffre' Florio, M Bartolotta, J C Miceli, G Giacobbe, F P Saitta, M T Paparo, B Micali

Journal: American journal of surgery 2000;180(1):24-8

PMID: 11036134

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Even though many types of reconstruction after total gastrectomy have been proposed to reduce postgastrectomy syndromes, choosing a method that would further improve the quality of life and nutrition of the gastrectomized patient is controversial. Hunt-Lawrence single pouch reconstruction seems to obtain better results compared with the more common Roux-en-Y technique, but both of these reconstructive approaches are associated with some reduction in food intake and some problems in achievement of ideal body weight.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized trial, after total gastrectomy 18 patients had reconstruction according to the Hunt-Lawrence or single pouch technique (SP group), whereas for 23 patients, the technique was modified with construction of a second pouch in the distal portion of the jejunal loop (DP group). Patients in the two groups were compared at 12 months after surgery for problems in gastrointestinal function, quality of life, improvement in body weight and nutritional parameters, serum albumin, hemoglobin level, and serum protein.

RESULTS

The DP group demonstrated fewer symptom problems, better weight maintenance, and better laboratory values when compared with patients undergoing standard single jejunal pouch reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with use of a double pouch as a gastric substitute leads to better outcome assessments than with a single pouch reconstruction. Our double pouch technique has demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life and nutritional recovery in terms of functional results as well as patient satisfaction.

Address: Department of General Surgery, University Hospital, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.