Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy--a systematic review.

A Hutchinson, A McIntosh, J Peters, C O'Keeffe, K Khunti, R Baker, A Booth

Journal: Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2000;17(7):495-506

PMID: 10972578

Abstract

AIMS

To determine which screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy are most effective and under what circumstances.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English language literature, published from 1983 to April 1999.

RESULTS

Available studies are generally limited in their ability to answer the important questions on the effectiveness of tests for early detection of diabetic retinopathy. No randomized controlled trials were identified although primary studies exist for two screening tests: ophthalmoscopy, either direct or indirect, and retinal photography, using either mydriasis or non-mydriasis. Retinal photography under mydriasis appears to be the most effective test, with the majority reporting levels of sensitivity in excess of 80%. However effectiveness is compromised when photographs are ungradable. Ophthalmoscopy can also reach acceptable standards of sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

Based on an assessment of available cohort studies, the most effective strategy for testing is the use of mydriatic retinal photography with the additional use of ophthalmoscopy for cases where photographs are ungradable. This does not exclude the use of ophthalmoscopy alone for opportunistic case finding but there is evidence of considerable variation in effectiveness of this test.

Address: Section of Public Health, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.