High-resolution melting analysis for accurate detection of BRAF mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dong Chen, Yan-Yan Wang, Zheng-Ran Chuai, Jun-Fu Huang, Yun-Xia Wang, Kai Liu, Li-Qun Zhang, Zhao Yang, Da-Chuan Shi, Qian Liu, Qing Huang, Wei-Ling Fu

Journal: Scientific reports 2014;4():4168

PMID: 24566771

Abstract

The high-resolution melting curve analysis (HRMA) might be a good alternative method for rapid detection of BRAF mutations. However, the accuracy of HRMA in detection of BRAF mutations has not been systematically evaluated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 1324 samples from 14 separate studies. The overall sensitivity of HRMA was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-0.82), and the overall specificity was very high at 0.99 (95% CI = 0.94-0.98). The values for the pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 68.01 (95% CI = 25.33-182.64), 0.06 (95% CI = 0.03-0.11), and 1263.76 (95% CI = 393.91-4064.39), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve for the same data shows an area of 1.00 and a Q* value of 0.97. The high sensitivity and specificity, simplicity, low cost, less labor or time and rapid turnaround make HRMA a good alternative method for rapid detection of BRAF mutations in the clinical practice.

Address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.; Research and service centre of laboratory medicine, Chengdu Military general Hospital, Chengdu, PR China.; Research Center for Nutrition and Food Safety, Institute of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.