Variation in feeding practices following the Norwood procedure.

Bethany Trainor, Richard V Williams, Bronwyn H Bartle, Sinai C Zyblewski, Christian Pizarro, David S Cooper, Rosalind Korsin, Louise Bannister, Nancy Rudd, Karen Uzark, Linda M Lambert, Richard G Ohye, Kathryn N Nelson, Martha L Clabby, Lisa Young-Borkowski, Victoria L Pemberton, Victor Zak, Barbara Medoff-Cooper, Nancy A Pike

Journal: The Journal of pediatrics 2014;164(2):237-42.e1

PMID: 24210923

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess variation in feeding practice at hospital discharge after the Norwood procedure, factors associated with tube feeding, and associations among site, feeding mode, and growth before stage II.

STUDY DESIGN

From May 2005 to July 2008, 555 subjects from 15 centers were enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial; 432 survivors with feeding data at hospital discharge after the Norwood procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical variables were compared among 4 feeding modes: oral only (n = 140), oral/tube (n = 195), nasogastric tube (N-tube) only (n = 40), and gastrostomy tube (G-tube) only (n = 57). There was significant variation in feeding mode among sites (oral only 0%-81% and G-tube only 0%-56%, P < .01). After adjusting for site, multivariable modeling showed G-tube feeding at discharge was associated with longer hospitalization, and N-tube feeding was associated with greater number of discharge medications (R(2) = 0.65, P < .01). After adjusting for site, mean pre-stage II weight-for-age z-score was significantly higher in the oral-only group (-1.4) vs the N-tube-only (-2.2) and G-tube-only (-2.1) groups (P = .04 and .02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Feeding mode at hospital discharge after the Norwood procedure varied among sites. Prolonged hospitalization and greater number of medications at the time of discharge were associated with tube feeding. Infants exclusively fed orally had a higher weight-for-age z score pre-stage II than those fed exclusively by tube. Exploring strategies to prevent morbidities and promote oral feeding in this highest risk population is warranted.

Published by Mosby, Inc.

Address: Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: [email protected].; University of California, Los Angeles, CA.; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.; New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA.; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.; Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.; Emory University, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.; University of Michigan, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor, MI.; University of Michigan School of Medicine, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor, MI.; Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Columbia University, New York, NY.; Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, Orlando, FL.; Nemours Cardiac Center, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE.; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.; Duke University, Durham, NC.; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.