Interrater reliability assessment using the Test of Gross Motor Development-2.

Lisa M Barnett, Christine Minto, Natalie Lander, Louise L Hardy

Journal: Journal of science and medicine in sport 2015;17(6):667-70

PMID: 24211133

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to examine interrater reliability of the object control subtest from the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 by live observation in a school field setting.

DESIGN

Reliability Study--cross sectional.

METHODS

Raters were rated on their ability to agree on (1) the raw total for the six object control skills; (2) each skill performance and (3) the skill components. Agreement for the object control subtest and the individual skills was assessed by an intraclass correlation (ICC) and a kappa statistic assessed for skill component agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 37 children (65% girls) aged 4-8 years (M = 6.2, SD = 0.8) were assessed in six skills by two raters; equating to 222 skill tests. Interrater reliability was excellent for the object control subset (ICC = 0.93), and for individual skills, highest for the dribble (ICC = 0.94) followed by strike (ICC = 0.85), overhand throw (ICC = 0.84), underhand roll (ICC = 0.82), kick (ICC = 0.80) and the catch (ICC = 0.71). The strike and the throw had more components with less agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the overall subtest score and individual skill agreement was good, some skill components had lower agreement, suggesting these may be more problematic to assess. This may mean some skill components need to be specified differently in order to improve component reliability.

Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].; School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Australia.; Physical Activity Nutrition Obesity Research Group, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.