KTP 532 nm laser for laryngeal lesions. a systematic review.

Xuanqian Xie, Jonathan Young, Karen Kost, Maurice McGregor

Journal: Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation 2013;27(2):245-9

PMID: 23294705

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser for vocal fold surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

Our systematic review was conducted using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. We applied the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine to assess the level of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified seven observational studies of eight case series, which reported a total of 243 KTP procedures carried out for vocal fold lesions: two series each concerning ectasias and varices, early glottic cancer, and recurrent papillomatosis, and one series each for keratosis with dysplasia and various benign laryngeal pathologies. There was also a retrospective review of the use of KTP laser in 387 endoscopic laryngeal surgeries. No studies compared the use of KTP laser with that of other technologies. Thus, according to the Oxford criteria, there is only level 4 evidence of KTP's efficacy and safety. In selected cases, the KTP instrument can be used without general anesthesia in the clinic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of KTP laser for laryngeal surgery is still relatively innovative. Several surgeons have found KTP laser to be the equivalent of, or superior to, the CO2 or pulsed dye lasers, and none have reported inferiority. However, there are currently no published data to support these conclusions. To establish equality/superiority, it is desirable that further evidence of efficacy and safety be obtained, either through randomized controlled trials or at least through well-documented prospective observational studies with reporting of all relevant input and outcome data.

Copyright © 2013 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Technology Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.