Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia.

Mark N Welch, Craig N Czyz, Kevin Kalwerisky, David E E Holck, Lisa D Mihora

Journal: Ophthalmology 2012;119(10):2048-52

PMID: 22771049

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determine if raising the pH of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000 to a physiologic level decreases pain perception during periocular, subcutaneous anesthesia.

DESIGN

Double-blind, prospective, randomized study. Simultaneous unilateral injections of buffered and unbuffered lidocaine solutions were given before surgery to patients having bilateral, periocular surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four consecutive patients (27 male and 27 female; mean age, 68 years; standard deviation, 11 years).

INTERVENTION

Patients were given simultaneous injections of buffered and unbuffered 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000. The needles were inserted simultaneously and the anesthesia was injected for a 20-second count for a total volume of 1.0 ml per injected side.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After the simultaneous injections, the patients were asked to rate the pain on each side on a Likert-type visual analog scale of 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of patients preferred the buffered lidocaine with a scaled pain reduction of 0.9 (P = 0.0005). Additionally, for the patients who believed that the buffered solution was less painful, the mean decrease in scaled pain rating was 2, for a 51% reduction in pain level (P = 0.001). No gender differences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Buffering 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000 with sodium bicarbonate 8.4% offers a clinically and statistically significant reduction in pain experienced by two-thirds of patients receiving periocular subcutaneous anesthesia.

Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Ophthalmology, Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.