A hitchhiker's guide to assessing sedentary behaviour among young people: deciding what method to use.

Louise L Hardy, Andrew P Hills, Anna Timperio, Dylan Cliff, David Lubans, Philip J Morgan, Barry J Taylor, Helen Brown

Journal: Journal of science and medicine in sport 2013;16(1):28-35

PMID: 22749939

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide a user's guide for selecting an appropriate method to assess sedentary behaviours among children and adolescents.

DESIGN

While recommendations regarding specific instruments are not provided, the guide offers information about key attributes and considerations for objective (accelerometry; inclinometers; direct observation; screen monitoring devices) and subjective (self-report; parent report; and time use diaries/logs) approaches to assess sedentary behaviour Attributes of instruments and other factors to be considered in the selection of assessment instruments include: population (age); sample size; respondent burden; method/delivery mode; assessment time frame; physical activity information required (data output); data management; measurement error; cost (instrument and administration) and other limitations.

METHODS

Expert consensus among members of the Australasian Child and Adolescent Obesity Research Network's (ACAORN) Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Special Interest Group.

RESULTS

We developed decision flow charts to assist researchers and practitioners select an appropriate method of assessing sedentary behaviour, identified attributes of each method and described five real-life scenarios to illustrate considerations associated with the selection of each method of measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that researchers, practitioners and policy makers understand the strengths and limitations of different methods of assessing sedentary behaviour among youth, and are guided on selection of the most appropriate instrument/s to suit their needs.

Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.