Epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline in subacute sciatica: a multicenter, randomized trial.

Steven P Cohen, Ronald L White, Connie Kurihara, Thomas M Larkin, Audrey Chang, Scott R Griffith, Christopher Gilligan, Ralph Larkin, Benny Morlando, Paul F Pasquina, Tony L Yaksh, Conner Nguyen

Journal: Annals of internal medicine 2012;156(8):551-9

PMID: 22508732

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perineural inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor have recently generated intense interest as an alternative to epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline better improves pain and function in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

DESIGN

A multicenter, 3-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 2008 to 2011. Randomization was computer-generated and stratified by site. Pharmacists prepared the syringes. Patients, treating physicians, and nurses assessing outcomes were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00733096)

SETTING

Military and civilian treatment centers.

PATIENTS

84 adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy of less than 6 months' duration.

INTERVENTION

2 epidural injections of steroids, etanercept, or saline, mixed with bupivacaine and separated by 2 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was leg pain 1 month after the second injection. All patients had 1-month follow-up visits; patients whose condition improved remained blinded for the 6-month study period.

RESULTS

The group that received epidural steroids had greater reductions in the primary outcome measure than those who received saline (mean difference, -1.26 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.27]; P = 0.11) or etanercept (mean difference, -1.01 [CI, -2.60 to 0.58]; P = 0.21). For back pain, smaller differences favoring steroids compared with saline (mean difference, -0.52 [CI, -1.85 to 0.81]; P = 0.44) and etanercept (mean difference, -0.92 [CI,-2.28 to 0.44]; P = 0.18) were observed. The largest differences were noted for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etanercept (mean difference, -16.16 [CI, -26.05 to -6.27]; P = 0.002), steroids vs. saline (mean difference, -5.87 [CI, -15.59 to 3.85]; P = 0.23), and etanercept vs. saline (mean difference, 10.29 [CI, 0.55 to 20.04]; P = 0.04). More patients treated with epidural steroids (75%) reported 50% or greater leg pain relief and a positive global perceived effect at 1 month than those who received saline (50%) or etanercept (42%) (P = 0.09).

LIMITATION

Short-term follow-up, small sample size, and a possibly subtherapeutic dose of etanercept.

CONCLUSION

Epidural steroid injections may provide modest short-term pain relief for some adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy, but larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm their benefits.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, International Spinal Intervention Society, and Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research.

Address: Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.