Andrea L Paiva, James O Prochaska, Hui-Qing Yin, Joseph S Rossi, Colleen A Redding, Bryan Blissmer, Mark L Robbins, Wayne F Velicer, Jessica Lipschitz, Nicole Amoyal, Steven F Babbin, Cerissa L Blaney, Marie A Sillice, Anne Fernandez, Heather McGee, Satoshi Horiuchi
Journal: Preventive medicine 2012;54(5):331-4
PMID: 22425936
OBJECTIVE
This study compared, in treatment and control groups, the phenomena of coaction, which is the probability that taking effective action on one behavior is related to taking effective action on a second behavior.
METHODS
Pooled data from three randomized trials of Transtheoretical Model (TTM) tailored interventions (n=9461), completed in the U.S. in 1999, were analyzed to assess coaction in three behavior pairs (diet and sun protection, diet and smoking, and sun protection and smoking). Odds ratios (ORs) compared the likelihood of taking action on a second behavior compared to taking action on only one behavior.
RESULTS
Across behavior pairs, at 12 and 24 months, the ORs for the treatment group were greater on an absolute basis than for the control group, with two being significant. The combined ORs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, were 1.63 and 1.85 for treatment and 1.20 and 1.10 for control.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study with addictive, energy balance and appearance-related behaviors were consistent with results found in three studies applying TTM tailoring to energy balance behaviors. Across studies, there was more coaction within the treatment group. Future research should identify predictors of coaction in more multiple behavior change interventions.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.