Lack of periconceptional vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid and diabetes mellitus-associated birth defects.

Adolfo Correa, Suzanne M Gilboa, Lorenzo D Botto, Cynthia A Moore, Charlotte A Hobbs, Mario A Cleves, Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso, D Kim Waller, E Albert Reece

Journal: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012;206(3):218.e1-13

PMID: 22284962

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of birth defects in relation to diabetes mellitus and the lack of use of periconceptional vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study (1997-2004) is a multicenter, population-based case-control study of birth defects (14,721 cases and 5437 control infants). Cases were categorized into 18 types of heart defects and 26 noncardiac birth defects. We estimated odds ratios for independent and joint effects of preexisting diabetes mellitus and a lack of periconceptional use of vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid.

RESULTS

The pattern of odds ratios suggested an increased risk of defects that are associated with diabetes mellitus in the absence vs the presence of the periconceptional use of vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid.

CONCLUSION

The lack of periconceptional use of vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid may be associated with an excess risk for birth defects due to diabetes mellitus.

Published by Mosby, Inc.

Address: Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.