Charles E Matthews, Tom Baranowski, Carl J Caspersen, Louise C Mâsse, Barbara E Ainsworth, Weimo Zhu
Journal: Journal of physical activity & health 2012;9 Suppl 1(0 1):S76-84
PMID: 22287451
CONTEXT
Assessment of physical activity using self-report has the potential for measurement error that can lead to incorrect inferences about physical activity behaviors and bias study results.
OBJECTIVE
To provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of physical activity derived from self report.
PROCESS
We provide an overview of presentations and a compilation of perspectives shared by the authors of this paper and workgroup members.
FINDINGS
We identified a conceptual framework for reducing errors using physical activity self-report questionnaires. The framework identifies 6 steps to reduce error: 1) identifying the need to measure physical activity, 2) selecting an instrument, 3) collecting data, 4) analyzing data, 5) developing a summary score, and 6) interpreting data. Underlying the first 4 steps are behavioral parameters of type, intensity, frequency, and duration of physical activities performed, activity domains, and the location where activities are performed. We identified ways to reduce measurement error at each step and made recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and organizational units to reduce error in questionnaire assessment of physical activity.
CONCLUSIONS
Self-report measures of physical activity have a prominent role in research and practice settings. Measurement error may be reduced by applying the framework discussed in this paper.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.