Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature.

Ruth King, Pauline Glover, Kathryn Byrt, Leonie Porter-Nocella

Journal: Midwifery 2012;27(5):674-86

PMID: 20850211

Full Text on Elsevier Science View on PubMed

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour.

DESIGN

literature review (1988-2009).

SETTING

Westernised maternity care settings.

PARTICIPANTS

women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.

Address: Women's & Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, 5006, South Australia, Australia. [email protected]

DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006

Link outs

Free resources

Medical:

https://medlineplus.gov/childbirth.html

Subscription / membership required

Full Text Sources:

MeSH Terms: Administration, Oral, Drinking, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Ketosis, Labor, Obstetric, Midwifery, Mothers, Pregnancy, Respiratory Aspiration