Brain retractor systems.

Manuel Dujovny, Onyekachi Ibe, Alfred Perlin, Travis Ryder

Journal: Neurological research 2011;32(7):675-83

PMID: 20433778

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reviews of the brain retractor evolution are described. Instrument characteristics as well as the physiopathological and histopathological damage of the brain are induced by brain retraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature related to the brain retractor was reviewed. Journals, books, personal testimony, government patents, and electronic media databases were analysed.

RESULTS

The brain retractor started as a hand-held flat ribbon manufactured on copper and stainless steel. This shape evolved into a shovel. Several shapes acquired from the early period were from a tappered, spoon shape covered by silicone. The posterior evolution was the development of the articulate arm, fixed to the skull or to the self-retaining subcutaneous retractor, or attached to a frame or to a stereotactic instrument. The pressure monitor was the most important safety addition.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a better monitor system needs to be developed to avoid brain injury.

Address: Biomechanic Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. [email protected]

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.