Evaluation of the abrasiveness of dentifrices for complete dentures.

Marina Xavier Pisani, Juliana Pascotti Bruhn, Helena Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato, Raphael Freitas de Souza, Heitor Panzeri

Journal: Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2010;19(5):369-73

PMID: 20456027

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the surface roughness and weight loss in Plex Glass specimens caused by dentifrices, one conventional (Sorriso) and three specific for dentures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens (n = 6) of Plex Glass were divided into 5 groups including: negative control (water); positive control 1 (Sorriso) and 2 (Corega Brite); Experimental 1 (containing Chloramine T, antimicrobial agent); and Experimental 2 (containing Zonyl, detergent). Brushing was performed in a toothbrushing machine (Pepsodent) with a soft brush and a suspension of toothpaste and distilled water for 300 minutes, representing 6 years of brushing. Weight was measured initially and after the trial period; roughness was measured after the trial period only. The results of roughness and weight loss were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests at 5%.

RESULTS

The negative control (2.82 +/- 4.41 mg) showed the lowest weight loss. Experimental 1 (13.62 +/- 4.29 mg) and Experimental 2 (15.4 +/- 5.80 mg) were equal statistically, and Sorriso (23.22 +/- 7.23 mg) and Corega (28.83 +/- 6.34 mg) produced the greatest weight loss. Concerning roughness, the negative control group (0.03 +/- 0.01 microm) showed the lowest value. No significant differences were found between Corega (13.43 +/- 1.65 microm), Experimental 1 (12.28 +/- 0.85 microm), and Experimental 2 (10.68 +/- 2.56 microm). The Sorriso toothpaste produced the greatest amount of surface roughness (19.15 +/- 2.36 microm).

CONCLUSION

Of the tested dentifrices, the experimental preparations proved to be the least abrasive and resulted in the lowest weight loss after brushing of the acrylic. Based on these findings, the use of these experimental dentifrices is advocated. Further evaluation based on the ability of these preparations to remove biofilms is required.

Address: Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.